Especially the poor ones. Emissions Cuts Costlier to the Poor--WSJ.com:
Instituting a carbon "cap-and-trade" system to help address climate change would drive up energy costs and result in higher prices for consumers, with the poorest households bearing the brunt, according to a report by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The federal government "would face higher prices for energy and other carbon-intensive goods and services" under a cap-and-trade program, the report said.
Doesn't sound very "progressive" to me.
Samsung Galaxy A5 2015, my homepage: pin samsung galaxy a5 2015
ReplyDelete